Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer.

نویسندگان

  • Elizabeth M Ward
  • Paul A Schulte
  • Steve Bayard
  • Aaron Blair
  • Paul Brandt-Rauf
  • Mary Ann Butler
  • David Dankovic
  • Ann F Hubbs
  • Carol Jones
  • Myra Karstadt
  • Gregory L Kedderis
  • Ronald Melnick
  • Carrie A Redlich
  • Nathaniel Rothman
  • Russell E Savage
  • Michael Sprinker
  • Mark Toraason
  • Ainsley Weston
  • Andrew F Olshan
  • Patricia Stewart
  • Sheila Hoar Zahm
چکیده

Occupational cancer research methods was identified in 1996 as 1 of 21 priority research areas in the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA). To implement NORA, teams of experts from various sectors were formed and given the charge to further define research needs and develop strategies to enhance or augment research in each priority area. This article is a product of that process. Focus on occupational cancer research methods is important both because occupational factors play a significant role in a number of cancers, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality, and also because occupational cohorts (because of higher exposure levels) often provide unique opportunities to evaluate health effects of environmental toxicants and understand the carcinogenic process in humans. Despite an explosion of new methods for cancer research in general, these have not been widely applied to occupational cancer research. In this article we identify needs and gaps in occupational cancer research methods in four broad areas: identification of occupational carcinogens, design of epidemiologic studies, risk assessment, and primary and secondary prevention. Progress in occupational cancer will require interdisciplinary research involving epidemiologists, industrial hygienists, toxicologists, and molecular biologists.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Performance and Scientific collaboration of Iran Occupational Health Journal: A scientometric analysis

Background: Of common scientometric indices is evaluating the performance and scientific collaboration of journals and organizations. Iran Occupational Health Journal belongs to Iran University of Medical Sciences and committed to providing scientific evidence for improving occupational health. Based on the importance of health at work, this study aimed to evaluate the Journal’s performance and...

متن کامل

Employment and the common cancers: return to work of cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND Support for the return to work of working-age adult cancer survivors is a major theme for occupational health professionals in Europe. AIMS To provide an overview of the outcomes of recent European research in this field and discusses future research directions to explore and improve the return-to-work experience of cancer survivors. METHODS European research, principally from En...

متن کامل

Research priorities in occupational health in Italy.

OBJECTIVE To find a broad consensus on research priorities and strategies in the field of occupational health and safety in Italy. METHODS A two phase questionnaire survey was based on the Delphi technique previously described in other reports. 310 Occupational safety and health specialists (from universities and local health units) were given an open questionnaire (to identify three priority...

متن کامل

اولویت های پژوهشی بهداشت کار

Background and aims: Prioritizing research fields prevents wastage of budgets and increase efficacy of research. Paying attention to health of employees and workers is necessary for promoting health and sustainable development in the country. Therefore this study was conducted in order to determine the research priorities in the field of occupational health in Iran. Methods: In order to dete...

متن کامل

Comparison of competency priorities between UK occupational physicians and occupational health nurses

OBJECTIVES The competencies required of occupational physicians (OPs) and occupational health nurses (OHNs) separately have been studied in various countries but little research has made direct comparisons between these two key occupational health (OH) professional groups. The aim of this study was to compare current competency priorities between UK OPs and OHNs. METHODS A modified Delphi stu...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Environmental Health Perspectives

دوره 111  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003